New refutation of Sam Shamoun. Read more to read part 4 as well.
Part 5 and Conclusion to come soon!
Keep an eye here for when it comes out.
As-Salamu Alaikum
Cross-Dressing or Triple-Crossing (4)!
Mirt, Thaub, Li'haf, Shi`ar, Kisaa as Bed-covering
By Jalal Abualrub (www.IslamLife.com)
Is it Muhammad’s Failure as a Husband or the Failure of AnsweringIslam to be Honorable in their Enmity to Islam?
In their new cross-dressing article, AnsweringIslam, represented by a man who likes to be called Esther, added to the article what has nothing to do with cross-dressing, so I will answer part of those irrelevant slander allegations here. To satisfy the uncontrollable urge they feel to be wicked, AnsweringIslam somehow inserts Prophet Muhammad's treatment of his wives into the topic. We certainly have no interest in discussing this lie here at length. This series of articles exposed the enormous ignorance AnsweringIslam has in Islam and how they lie, corrupt and deceive to satisfy their rage against Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him.
However, we would like to offer a brief answer to AnsweringIslam's lies about Prophet Muhammad's treatment of his wives and their false claim accusing Allah of discrimination against the Prophet's wives, whatever that means. The wicked team does not seem to have a limit as to how much they can lie, slander and deceive to discredit Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, and his message. They think that this is the only way to counter the tremendous advances made by Islam especially in the midst of Christian Europe and the Americas. They know their creed does not stand a chance, because their creed does not make sense to them or to anyone else. Instead of discussing Christian creed vs. Islamic creed, they practice slander against Allah, Islam, Islam's Prophet and the Islamic creed. Here is the proof, and the outrage.
The AnsweringIslam team wrote, “Muhammad’s Failure as a Husband How Abualrub’s deity discriminated against the mothers of the believers”, then went on to invent conclusions on stories they collected from Hadeeths regarding the Prophet, peace be upon him, and his wives. They are liars, and this series of articles proved this fact. We may respond to their other new lies later on Inshaallah. However, we should assert here the fact that the wicked man who authored this new AnsweringIslam rebuttal does not end his disrespect of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, any way he can. He cannot use honorable words to express his personal rejection of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. He has to be rather abusive and downright lowly, also using rather abusive words to describe Allah, Lord of Adam, Nu'h (Noah), Ibrahim (Abraham), Musa (Moses), `Esa (Jesus), and Muhammad, peace be upon them. None of these honorable prophets ever called Allah by the name, God.
This is the Evangelical way it seems, a wicked team that has wicked men for authors, such as their lead author who likes to call himself Esther. This team lies and brings an invention that no Muslim ever said, claiming what no one else before them, Muslim or non-Muslim, ever claimed, that Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, was a cross-dresser who mistreated his wives.
To the contrary, the Prophet, peace be upon him, used to not go to bed but after greeting everyone of his wives, and would divide among them whatever he earned of food even though he had a taste for what he divided among them. Imam Muslim reported that the Prophet of Allah, peace be upon him, ordered Muslims to invoke Allah in their prayer to grant His Salah (mercy and forgiveness) to his wives; Muslims faithfully do that until today. In the illness that preceded his death, the Prophet of Allah, peace be upon him, asked his wives for permission to be in Aishah's house while he was ill (Sahih Muslim). There is a lot more to say about this; the Prophet of Allah, peace be upon him, was the best husband any woman could ever have. What AnsweringIslam says is an outrage, an enormous lie with which they slander Allah's Prophet. There is not a woman who could love a man more than the Prophet's wives loved him, peace be upon him.
Well, never mind the Prophet's treatment of his wife, it was exemplary on all accounts. Every one among the Prophet's wives gladly remained with him, peace be upon him, when Allah, the Exalted, gave them the choice to divorce him; they gladly wished to remain married to him (Bukhari, and, Muslim, from Aishah). And Allah did not discriminate against His Prophet's wives, but instead promised them the greatest of rewards for their being the wives of His Prophet, {O, Prophet (Muhammad)! Say to your wives: “If you desire the life of this world, and its glitter, then come! I will make a provision for you and set you free in a handsome manner (divorce).But if you desire Allâh and His Messenger, and the Home of the Hereafter, then verily, Allâh has prepared for Al‑Muhsinât (good‑doers) amongst you an enormous reward.”} (33:28-29) They all chose Allah, His Messenger and Paradise! Can it be that they made this choice because they liked discrimination against them by Allah, Who promised them great rewards in Paradise, or that they liked staying married to a man who mistreated them? AnsweringIslam is just wicked.
The question to ask is not how Allah and His Prophet mistreated and discriminated against the Prophet's wives; they treated them perfectly. The question to ask is, what about the success or failure of the biblical God as a husband and his stance on women. What were women promised in the Bible as compared to what Allah promised them in the Quran, {And whosoever does a righteous deed, whether male or female and is a true believer (in the Oneness of Allâh), such will enter Paradise, where they will be provided therein (with all things in abundance) without limit} (40:40)? That's what matters, for two reasons. The first reason, this exposes the endless hypocrisy that the enemies of Islam live in and on. The second reason, it exposes the Bible itself as being the corrupt word of anonymous men who ascribed horrible actions and commandment to the Creator of all things.
A 9-Year Old is a Child; a 12 Year Old is a Full Grown Lover!
In a bizarre article found on their wicked website, (http://answering-islam.org/Shamoun/marriage_age.htm), AnsweringIslam accuses God of being a failure as a spouse, even as a lover, in his marriage to a prostitute called, Jerusalem! As horrible as this may sound, the author of this article, Sam Shamoun, did not comment on this terrible parable, but somehow benefited from it by deciding the marriage age limit in the Bible: it is 12 years old, not 9! Yet he calls Aishah, Muhammad’s ‘Child Bride.’ In contrast to a 9 year old, a 12 year old bride is a ‘Mature Bride’, so dare not call her a ‘Child Bride’!
Sam Shamoun wrote in his marriage age article that the, “Bible makes a reference to the general age of a girl considered for marriage … in a parable where God likens Israel to a baby girl whom Yahweh … eventually married … this specific parable present the marriageable age of a girl … God mentions that the young babe attained the age for lovemaking after her breasts had formed and her pubic hairs had grown, clear signs of puberty.”
He goes on to quote Ezekiel 16:4-14 which has this astonishing segment about God’s lover, Jerusalem, “You grew up and developed and became the most beautiful of jewels. Your breasts were formed and your hair grew, you who were naked and bare. Later I passed by, and when I looked at you and saw that you were old enough for love (not, old enough for marriage?), I spread the corner of my garment over you (Jerusalem, a female prostitute, and by an act of God, used to wear men’s clothing, and not any man, but God Himself! Allah, the Exalted, is praised from this utter disbelief) and covered your nakedness. I gave you my solemn oath and entered into a covenant with you, declares the Sovereign Lord, and you became mine. I bathed you with water and washed the blood (which blood?) from you and put ointments on you. I clothed you with an embroidered dress and put leather sandals on you. I dressed you in fine linen and covered you with costly garments. I adorned you with jewelry: I put bracelets on your arms and a necklace around your neck, and I put a ring on your nose, earrings on your ears and a beautiful crown on your head. … You became very beautiful and rose to be a queen. And your fame spread among the nations on account of your beauty, because the splendor I had given you made your beauty perfect, declares the Sovereign Lord.”
But, KJV’s Ezekiel 16 states that Jerusalem, God's lover as they falsely claim, became a whore, “But thou didst trust in thine own beauty, and playedst the harlot because of thy renown, and pouredst out thy fornications on every one that passed by; his it was. … And of thy garments thou didst take, and deckedst thy high places with divers colours, and playedst the harlot thereupon: the like things shall not come, neither shall it be so. … Thou hast also taken thy fair jewels of my gold and of my silver, which I had given thee, and madest to thyself images of men, and didst commit whoredom with them. … Moreover thou hast taken thy sons and thy daughters, whom thou hast borne unto me, and these hast thou sacrificed unto them to be devoured. Is this of thy whoredoms a small matter. … But as a wife that committeth adultery, which taketh strangers instead of her husband!”
How nice! Jerusalem seems to have not been satisfied at all by her affair with God. She committed all these dishonorable acts in spite of being God's lover. Ezekiel 16, no matter the version of the Bible you read, describes a failed marriage, not even that, a failed love affair, doesn’t it? Therefore, let us not discuss Prophet Muhammad's failure as a husband to his wives, each of whom used to address him by saying, "O, Messenger of Allah!" Let us discuss the biblical false accusation of God's affair with a whore called Jerusalem and how He failed to satisfy her needs that she turned to whoredom.
This is not where we discuss the other slanders of AnsweringIslam against Prophet Muhammad and his wives or against the Creator of all things. Their lies and descriptions of the Creator are just awful. In this series of articles and in other articles we wrote, we duly exposed AnsweringIslam as liars whose intent and life-mission is to slander Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, so that the spread of Islam is hindered, so they think. Meanwhile, Islam continues its blessed march even in the middle of the lands of Christendom. No doubt, the final victory and triumph is for Islam, a promise from Allah, the Exalted, the Honored, a promise that Muslims are now tasting its reality and fruitful fulfillment, {They (the disbelievers, the Jews and the Christians) want to extinguish Allâh’s Light (with which Muhammad has been sent — Islâmic Monotheism) with their mouths, but Allâh will not allow except that His Light should be perfected even though the Kâfirûn (disbelievers) hate (it).} (9:32)
All thanks and praises are due to Allah, Creator of all things, and may Allah's peace and blessings be on all of His Prophets, starting with Adam, passing through Nu'h (Noah), Ibrahim (Abraham), Musa (Moses), `Esa (Jesus), and ending with Muhammad.
Jalal Abualrub
www.islamlife.com
Cross Dressing or Triple Crossing Part 4:
http://islamlife.com/religion2/file-library/doc_download/27-cross-dressing-or-triple-crossing-4
| Comments |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||